CREATIVITY AS A PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CREATIVE THINKING
Keywords:
creativity, creative thinking, creative personality, frustrationAbstract
The article is devoted to the psychological analysis of the problem of creativity, creative thinking, and creativity. The content and the features of the frustration together with the level of frustration, stress, creativity, prevalence of the brain hemisphere, the typology of a personality and the level of creative potential are analyzed. The correlation and factor analysis of the obtained data is carried out. Author makes an accent on the study of the link between creativity and frustration because the purpose of the work is to study creativity and frustration as personal characteristics, as well as identification of the link between human creativity and frustration.
Creativity – the ability to generate unusual ideas that deviate from traditional patterns of thinking quickly solve problem situations. Frustration – a human condition, resulting in the characteristic features of emotions and behavior. The purpose of the empirical study was to investigate the level frustration, of stress, creativity, dominance hemisphere of the brain, the typology of personality
and the level of creativity. For processing the results used methods of mathematical statistics: methodological criterion of Pearson correlation, factor analysis.
During the study identified correlations between scales of techniques to determine the creativity of frustration, of stress, creativity, and personality typology found, the dominance of the hemisphere brain response and type of response to frustration situation. Done description of the results of the study by, established 7-factor model describing 59.71% allocation empirical research. According to the results, and based on the goal of research, we can draw the following conclusions: in order to develop their creativity and reduce frustration must always remain open new media, be flexible, labile not perceive obstacles and challenges as insurmountable barriers not limited to the available knowledge, opening new horizons of knowledge of their own activities, to discover something new and interesting, not to think stereotypically.
References
Богоявленская Д. Б. Интеллектуальная активность как проблема творчества / Д. Б. Богоявленская. – Ростов-на-Дону; изд-во Ростовского университета, 1993. – 173 с.
Василюк Ф. Е. Психология переживания / Ф. Е. Василюк. – М.: МГУ, 1984. – 200 с.
Дружинин В. Н. Психология общин спосібностей / В. Н. Дружинин. – СПб.: Питер, 2008. – 358 с.
Енциклопедія освіти; за ред. В. Кременя. − К.: Юрінком Інтер, 2008. − 1040 с.
Ильин Е. П. Психология творчества, креативності, одаренности / Е. П. Ильин. – СПб.: Питер, 2009. – 448 с.: ил. – (Серия «Мастера психологии»).
Львова И. В. Психологические факторы развития креативности личности: автореф. дис. на соиск. уч. степени канд. психол. наук / И. В. Львова. – Новосибирск, 2005. – 23 с.
Стратегії творчої діяльності: школа В. О. Моляко / за заг. ред. В. О. Моляко. – К.: Освіта України, 2008. – 702 с.
Остополець І. Ю. Диагностика і психокорекція професійних фрустрацій вчителя: автореф. дис. на здоб. наук. ступеня канд. психол. наук: 19.00.07 / І. Ю. Остополець; Центр. ін-т післядиплом. пед. освіти. – К., 2003. – 20 с.
Психологічна енциклопедія / автор-упорядник О. М. Степанов. – К.: Академвидав, 2006. – 424 с. (Енциклопедія ерудита).
Райгородский Д. Я. (редактор-составитель). Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты: учебное пособие / Д. Я. Райгородский. – Самара: БАХРАХ-М, 2001. – 672 с.
Розов В. І. Адаптивні антистресові психотехнології / В. І. Розов. – К.: КОНДОР, 2005. – 278 с.
Роменець В. А. Психологія творчості / В. А. Роменець. – К.: Либідь, 2001. – 288 с.
Туник Е. Е. Диагностика креативности. Тест Е. Торренса. Адаптированный вариант Е. Е. Туник / Е. Е. Туник. – СПб.: Речь, 2006. – 176 с.
Фрустрация: Понятие и диагностика / сост. Л. И. Дементий. – Омск: Изд-во ОмГУ, 2004. – 68 с.
Guilford J. P. Creativity / J. P. Guilford // American Psychologist. – 1990. – V. 5. – P. 444–454.
