ATTITUDE TOWARD GENERATION AND COUNTRY FUTURE LIKE LIFE SATISFACTION PREDICTOR

Authors

  • L. S. Oryshchyn-Buzhdyhan
  • Y. V. Ponajda

Keywords:

optimism, generation future, country future, life satisfaction

Abstract

Optimistic attitude is very important for modern youth. Psychological personal well-being is the optimal life circumstances evaluation for certain person. The purpose of this article is the analysis of generation and country future vision for modern youth, future planning and life satisfaction research. The authors’ research technique called Personal Future Vision Scale was used in this study. Study methodology was based on unrealistic optimism theory and on M. Fishbein I.Ajzen theory of reasoned action.
It provides both theoretical and empirical analysis of the concern. Main result is that people tend to put higher than average probability on positive event in their future rather than negative events. Events were associated with main areas of Young generations and country lives. Individuals were asked to evaluate them on a scale from 0 to 10 of being positive or negative with 0 – strictly negative and 10 – strictly positive. Additionally, participants were asked to put high or low probability tags on events. Cantril Ladder and Ed. Diener’s Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was used to measure life satisfaction level in this study. The study had done in 2016. The 90 participants different age (from 14 to 35 years) took part in the future vision study.
As a result, positive events were evaluated with probability higher than average of realization and negative events were considered improbable (lower than average) mostly for generation and partly for country future vision. Those result confirm the research hypotheses. Prevention dominated in modern youth generation and country future vision.
The result found a lot of pessimistic bias toward country future vision. Optimistic attitudes toward generation and country future were positively correlated with general life satisfaction level and negatively correlated with past life satisfaction level. This results totally confirmed all research hypothesis.

References

Sun R. C., Shek D. T. Beliefs in the future as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. The scientific world journal, 2012. – Pp. 128–141.

Beck U. Społeczeństwo Ryzyka. Warszawa: Wyd.Naukowe Scholar. – 2004.

Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research., 1975. – 575 p.

Diener, E., Seligman, M. E. Very happy people. Psychological science, 13 (1), 2002. – Pp. 81–84.

Diener E., Wirtz D., Biswas-Diener R., Tov W., Kim-Prieto Ch., Choi D., Oishi Sh. New Measures of Well-Being. Assessing Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series Vol. 39, 2009. – Pp. 247–266.

Gallup G. H. Human Needs and Satisfactions A Global Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40 (4), 1976. – Pp. 459–467.

Horley J., & Lavery J. J. The stability and sensitivity of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 24 (2), 1991. – Pp. 113–122.

Pavot W., & Diener E. The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3 (2), 2008. – Pp. 137–152.

Cantril H. The qualities of being human. American Quarterly Vol. 6, No. 1, 1954. – Pp. 3–18.

Lumsden, M. Social position and cognitive style in strategic thinking. Journal of Peace Research 4.3:, 1967. – Pp. 289–303.

Suh E. M., Diener E. D., & Updegraff J. A. From culture to priming conditions self-construal influences on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39 (1), 2008. – Pp. 3–15.

Fujita F., & Diener E. Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 (1), 2005. – Pp. 158–164.

Cummins, R. A. On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research 35, 1995. – Pp. 179–200.

Benbenishty D.L.R., Refaeli T. Life satisfaction and positive perceptions of 2the future among youth at-risk participating in Civic-National Service in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, Volume 34, Issue 10., 2012. – Pp. 2012–2017

Stoddard S. A., Zimmerman M. A., & Bauermeister J. A. Thinking about the future as a way to succeed in the present: A longitudinal study of future orientation and violent behaviors among African American youth. American journal of community psychology, 48 (3–4). – 2011. – Pp. 238–246.

Орищин Л. С. Нереалістичний оптимізм при плануванні майбутнього у сучасної молоді / Л. С. Орищин // Наукові праці ДонНТУ. Серія: Педагогіка, психологія і соціологія. – Львів, 2013. – Вип. № 1 (13). – С. 286–290.

Weinstein N. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, No. 25. – 1999. – Pp. 15–20.

Published

2023-04-06