ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ARMS CONTROL: INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND UKRAINIAN PRACTICE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2026-1-7

Keywords:

arms circulation, administrative control, licensing, permit system, arms registration, international standards, European Union, administrative procedures, public safety, digitalization

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of administrative procedures for controlling the circulation of weapons in Ukraine through the prism of international standards, in particular the practice of the European Union. The relevance of the study is due to the growth of threats associated with the illegal circulation of weapons, as well as the need to increase the effectiveness of state control in the field of public safety. The authors emphasize that administrative control is a key preventive mechanism that combines the regulatory and protective functions of the state, ensuring compliance with established rules even before the occurrence of offenses. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of administrative and legal mechanisms, among which the most important are licensing, the permit system, registration of weapons and supervisory procedures. It is established that the effectiveness of these instruments depends on their transparency, coherence and proper institutional support. International standards that shape modern approaches to controlling the circulation of weapons, in particular requirements for licensing, accounting, marking and interstate cooperation, are also analyzed. The article provides a comparative analysis of Ukrainian and European practice. It was found that Ukraine has an extensive regulatory framework, but it is characterized by fragmentation and an insufficient level of digitalization. Unlike the EU, where electronic registers and integrated accounting systems are widely used, the Ukrainian system needs modernization. The problems of applying administrative sanctions and proving offenses are separately considered. Summarizing the results, the authors justify the need to improve legislation, introduce digital technologies, increase the transparency of procedures and harmonize with European standards. This will contribute to increasing the efficiency of control and strengthening public safety.

References

Літошко В. В. Правове регулювання обігу вогнепальної зброї в Україні: проблеми та перспективи (аналіз адміністративно‑правових аспектів регулювання). Нове українське право. 2022, Вип. 6. Т. 2. С. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.51989/NUL.2022.6.2.5

Krüsselmann, K., Aarten P., Liem M. Firearms and violence in Europe-A systematic review. PloS One. 2021, 16 (4). e0248955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248955

Bashtova O. Control of civilian firearm circulation: object composition. Administrative law and process. 2022. № 11. С. 10–15. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2022.11.03

Білак М. М. Адміністративна відповідальність за порушення правил обігу цивільної вогнепальної зброї як складова державного контролю. Науковий вісник УжНУ. Серія: Право. 2024. № 83 (2). С. 96–102. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.83.2.20

Directive (EU) 2021/555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9cd1c24a-967e-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1

Хоменко А. О. Міжнародний досвід регулювання обігу зброї: шляхи впровадження в Україні. Правничий часопис Донецького національного університету імені Василя Стуса. 2024. № 2. С. 110–116. https://doi.org/10.31558/2786-5835.2024.2.18

Єсімов С. С., Боровікова В. С. Дозвільна діяльність у сфері надання послуг електронних комунікацій. Соціально-правові студії. 2021. Випуск 4 (4). С. 83–89. DOI 10.32518/2617-4162-2021-4-83-89

Alraggad, M. M., Almahasneh, А. А. А. А., Borovikova, V., Zhyvko, Z., & Komissarchuk, Y. The policy of rethinking the criminal process in the national security system: The impact of digitalisation on working with electronic evidence. Social and Legal Studios, 2024, 7 (2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2024.162

Конституція України. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 1996. № 30. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text

European Union. Directive 2021/555/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 on standards for data protection governance in the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. 2021, 24 March. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021L0555.

European Union. EU legislation on civilian weapons, 2021. (European Commission website). URL: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/internal-security/organised-crime/trafficking-firearms/eu-legislation-civilian-firearms_en

European Union. Directive 91/477/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 1991 laying down minimum standards for controlling the acquisition and possession of civilian firearms. Official Journal of the European Union, 1991. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1991/477/oj/eng

European Commission. Joint report to the Council of the EU on combating illicit arms trafficking and smuggling. Briussel, 2020. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0608

European Nonproliferation Center. Arms Brokering Controls in the European Union: How Are They Implemented? URL: https://nonproliferation.eu/arms-brokering-controls-how-are-they-implemented-in-the-eu/

Control Arms. The European Union and the Global Arms Trade. URL: https://controlarms.org/europe/

Рада Європи. Comparative Analysis of European Practices on Public Prosecutor’s Office: Criminal Justice and International Cooperation. URL: https://rm.coe.int/council-of-europe-comparative-analysis-ofeuropean-practices-on-public/1680aef1df European Commission. Joint report to the Council of the EU on combating illicit arms trafficking and smuggling

Бакаянова Н. М., Кубаєнко А. В., Кісліцина І. О. Сучасна концепція реформування судоустрою, судочинства та суміжних правових інститутів [Електронне видання] : навчально-методичний посібник (для здобувачів ступеня доктора філософії денної, вечірньої та заочної форми навчання) / Н. М. Бакаянова, А. В. Кубаєнко, І. О. Кісліцина. Одеса : Фенікс, 2021. 157 с. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstreams/73254d35-ba09-458a-a402-adbc53d36b32/download

Academia. Чи в усіх випадках важливо європеїзувати національне законодавство про кримінальну відповідальність? URL: https://www.academia.edu/38108929/Чи_в_усіх_випадках_важливо_європеїзувати_національне_законодавство_про_кримінальну_відповідальність

Published

2026-04-23

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE; FINANCIAL LAW; INFORMATION LAW